Partnership Through Spectacle
The most striking contradiction sits at the heart of this new body: several Muslim-majority nations are willingly placing themselves on the same board as Benjamin Netanyahu—longtime friend of the chairman and subject of active ICC arrest warrants for war crimes and crimes against humanity—knowing full well the personal and political relationship between the two men. Why would governments that publicly champion the Palestinian cause, host millions of Muslim populations, and face domestic pressure over Gaza agree to share power and legitimacy with Netanyahu?
The psychology is brutally pragmatic. These states are making a cold transactional calculation: access to American power, reconstruction contracts, security guarantees against Iran, and economic leverage outweigh moral consistency or public outrage at home. Joining buys them a seat at a table controlled by a chairman who has protected Netanyahu from international accountability. Staying out risks exclusion from the spoils of "peace"—oil deals, AI/tech partnerships, and Gulf investment flows already funneled through family-linked funds.This is realpolitik stripped bare: national interest framed as stability, while the human cost in Gaza is airbrushed from the charter.
The hypocrisy is not a bug; it's the price of admission. For these regimes, the Board represents an opportunity to secure influence and protection under a chairman-for-life structure that mirrors their own authoritarian preferences—while the chairman uses their participation to launder legitimacy for his legacy project. This isn't multilateral diplomacy. It is the Mar-a-Lago pay-to-play model ($1 million annual access fees, no visitor logs, foreign nationals buying influence) scaled to the global level, turbocharged by a $3.4–4 billion family extraction in roughly one year of the second term, enabled by shameless capture of contradictory markets, and driven by an urgent race to rewrite personal history before time expires.
Part 1: The Davos Grift – Board as Scaled Corruption
Terms: Chairman holds permanent role, invites members, designates successor, vetoes decisions. Board includes Rubio, Blair, Kushner, Witkoff, Banga, Rowan. Redevelopment pitches: luxury coastal "smart cities," ports, manufacturing—tied to "voluntary" relocation. Pre-planning: 2025 Witkoff admission of "master plans... for two years" (pre-escalation); Kushner visible discomfort on camera.
Mar-a-Lago Prototype → Board Global Scale
Mar-a-Lago: $1M initiation (up from $200k–$700k), no visitor logs, foreign nationals join for access. Chinese spy arrested 2019; classified docs stored; perfect for kompromat/extortion ("nice business..."). Board: $1B "membership" for permanent influence; same no-transparency, pay-for-access model—foreign governments buy seats while family-linked funds manage Gulf billions.
The Grift Taxonomy – Shamelessness as Superpower
Shamelessness eliminates hypocrisy brake—enables simultaneous capture of contradictory markets (Christian evangelicals + Muslim-majority states). Transactional worldview + revenge drive + spectacle creates gravitational pull: alliances via flattery/enrichment, not ideology.
Religious Grift – Christianity (Domestic)
- Bibles ($60, China-made), "God saved me" narrative, evangelical support despite contradictions (affairs, tapes, no attendance).
- Transaction: They get justices/moral cover; he gets votes + cash + "chosen" branding (NFTs as messiah figures).
Religious Grift – Islam (International)
- Board recruits Pakistan, Egypt, UAE, Saudi, Qatar, Turkey—post-Muslim ban rhetoric.
- Transaction: Access/power for them; billions for family (Saudi $2B to Kushner). Contradiction ignored.
Brand, Access, Crisis, Victimhood Grifts
- Crypto/memecoins ($2.37B), NFTs, merch, Truth Social; Mar-a-Lago/Executive Branch clubs ($1M/$500k access); COVID/Jan 6/Gaza as opportunities; legal fees/victim fundraising ($127.7M+). Pattern: Disaster = extraction; prosecutions = profit.
Brand, Access, Crisis, Victimhood Grifts
- Crypto/memecoins ($2.37B), NFTs, merch, Truth Social; Mar-a-Lago/Executive Branch clubs ($1M/$500k access); COVID/Jan 6/Gaza as opportunities; legal fees/victim fundraising ($127.7M+). Pattern: Disaster = extraction; prosecutions = profit.
Multi-Generational Dynasty
- Ivanka ($640M White House era), Kushner ($2B Saudi), Don Jr./Eric ($339.6M), Barron positioned, grandkids branded. Endgame: Brand perpetuity—every generation monetizes name.
Psychology – Legacy Race Against Mortality
At 79–82 during term: accelerating to rewrite history before death. Not rapist/fraudster/criminal → Napoleon: self-made visionary, dealmaker, revolutionary. Board as self-crowning monument (chairman-for-life, successor designation, own "code"); $4B haul as "greatness proof"; dynasty for immortality.
Supporters: Not stupid—traumatized/isolated (COVID bonds shredded), economically anxious, spiritually adrift, rage-permission seekers, parasocially attached for belonging. He fills voids with toxic community + vicarious power; media outrage cycles amplify.
The Access Grift: Buying "Peace" Like a Country Club Membership
The pattern is consistent and escalatory: pay money → gain proximity to power → extract influence or profit. What began as a private-club model at Mar-a-Lago has now been globalized through the Board of Peace. At Mar-a-Lago, initiation fees climbed from $100,000 to $200,000, then $700,000, and now $1 million per year (plus $14,000–$20,000 annual dues).
Foreign nationals and wealthy donors buy face time with the president in an environment with no public visitor logs—a deliberate design choice that creates the perfect environment for quiet deals, kompromat, and implied extortion ("nice relationship you have… shame if something disrupted it"). Don Jr.'s parallel "Executive Branch" club in D.C. charges $500,000 per year for similar "access. "The Board of Peace takes this logic to its logical extreme: $1 billion for a permanent seat. Not a one-time donation for humanitarian aid, but a flat fee granting veto-influenced membership in a body that decides "stability" and reconstruction priorities worldwide. The chairman alone controls invitations, decisions, and succession.
In practice, this means governments (many authoritarian or strategically transactional) purchase the right to shape outcomes in a forum where Gaza—the supposed original focus—is never mentioned.
Why this is a joke (and a dangerous one):
Peace cannot be purchased like a VIP table: The very act of requiring a billion-dollar entry fee transforms "peace" from a public good into a luxury service for the highest bidder. It guarantees that only regimes able and willing to pay get a voice—excluding the very populations most affected."
- It creates perverse incentives: countries join not because they believe in the mission, but because exclusion risks losing out on reconstruction contracts, security pacts, or protection from rivals (e.g., Iran). The "peace" board becomes a protection racket dressed as diplomacy.
- Transparency is structurally absent. No visitor logs at Mar-a-Lago; no public disclosure of who paid what, when, or what specific policy favors were discussed at the Board. This is not diplomacy—it's the privatization of foreign policy.
- It normalizes the idea that influence is for sale. If $1 billion buys a permanent seat at the "peace" table, what does that say about whose interests are truly represented? Certainly not the 2.3 million Palestinians whose future is being decided without their consent.
How real peace is possible instead:
Real peace requires the opposite of this transactional model. It demands:Inclusive agency: Palestinians must be equal partners at every stage of planning—not as supplicants or obstacles, but as decision-makers through legitimately chosen representatives (including Gaza civil society, refugees, and diaspora voices).
Accountability first: No credible peace process can seat individuals under active ICC arrest warrants for war crimes alongside the people they are accused of harming. Justice and reconciliation are prerequisites, not optional add-ons.
Multilateral legitimacy over elite clubs: Use established forums like the UN, Quartet, or expanded Arab Peace Initiative mechanisms that include civil society and enforce international law (ICJ advisory opinions on settlements, Geneva Conventions prohibitions on forced displacement and population transfer).
Economic justice, not luxury extraction: Reconstruction should prioritize Palestinian housing, healthcare, education, and sustainable livelihoods—not coastal high-rises marketed to foreign tourists. Any development must respect territorial integrity and the right of return. Security for all sides through mutual recognition: Genuine security emerges from addressing root grievances and power imbalances, not through permanent occupation, AI-driven kill lists, or "voluntary" relocation schemes that mask coercion.
Bottom-up initiatives: Support confederation models, joint economic zones, and people-to-people programs developed by Israeli and Palestinian peace activists, former negotiators, and grassroots organizations who have spent decades building trust.
The Access Grift pretends that elite proximity equals progress. History shows the opposite: every major breakthrough (Camp David, Oslo, even the Abraham Accords) succeeded when it moved beyond closed-door pay-to-play circles and incorporated broader legitimacy, inclusion, and enforcement mechanisms. Until the Board of Peace abandons its $1 billion country-club logic, it will remain a sophisticated form of conflict profiteering rather than a path to peace.
Core Truths
- Board = Mar-a-Lago grift scaled: $1B access, no transparency, foreign influence.
- Shamelessness enables omni-extraction (Christian + Muslim markets, crisis profiteering).
- Legacy race: Rewrite criminal → visionary via self-institution + obscene wealth.
- Citizens dismantle: Expose, preserve, litigate, pressure—refuse normalization.
Conclusion: No Rewrite Without Resistance
The Board is grift incarnate—shameless extraction, impunity architecture, mortality-driven monument. But it's vulnerable: built on contradictions, refusals, exposure. Every documented connection, amplified refusal, lawsuit filed, investor question chips at the facade. Impunity needs silence; break it with relentless visibility and collective action. The legacy rewrite fails when we refuse the script. We're not extras in a warped showman's sideshow, we're Americans, and together there's strength in our numbers. All men (and women) are created equally allergic to the normalization of being written into another man's satire.